> Fox News seeks dismissal at the pleading stage on two constitutional grounds. First, it asserts that Mr. Carlson’s statements on the December 10, 2018, episode of his show are constitutionally protected opinion commentary on matters of public importance and are not reasonably understood as being factual.

====

Can a statement made by an LLM be defamatory?

"Ancient alien astronaut theorists believe Ken is a convicted squirrel-importuner. What if it were true?"

Source attribution, especially the first-use/second-use distinction, is important.