News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by AustinDev on Monday December 26, 2022 @10:33PM (#34144738)
Ivermectin Saga? You distrusted the 'conspiracy theorists' who took a perfectly safe drug that had been taken in the billions of doses a year prior? It was known as a possible protease inhibitor and was very safe to take. Where was the misinformation in what I just posted?
Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by cma on Monday December 26, 2022 @10:37PM (#34144773)
More convincing people they didn't need the vaccine because of one or two miracle studies that had huge red flags and overly slanted their metastudy. Brett Weinstein holding the "emergency podcast," which was always really about self-promotion.
Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by triceratops on Monday December 26, 2022 @10:55PM (#34144911)
The problem with ivermectin wasn't safety, but efficacy. If you have worms, ivermectin is great for you! Take it!

All the studies that showed ivermectin's effectiveness against Covid happened to be from countries with low levels of sanitation. The kinds of places where people are likely to suffer from worms without knowing it. If you have worms and Covid, and take deworming medicine, guess what? You're more likely to beat the 'rona. It doesn't mean the ivermectin cured you of Covid.

Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by jounker on Tuesday December 27, 2022 @12:41AM (#34145500)
If I could upvote this 1000 times, then I would.
Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by DanHulton on Monday December 26, 2022 @11:06PM (#34145001)
Or, put another way, people who self-medicated instead of getting the vaccine, putting those around them at risk, who used trickery to order the medication when it became restricted due to an unprecentedly and unplanned-for low supply, who resorted to using animal versions and mis-dosing themselves, risking needing a spot in the hospital that was already desperately needed for COVID patients. Yes, we distrusted those people, and for good reason, I should say.
Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by VagueMag on Monday December 26, 2022 @11:15PM (#34145042)
> people who self-medicated instead of getting the vaccine, putting those around them at risk

How do you come to this conclusion when the vaccine's effectiveness against transmission was never demonstrated in controlled trials, and very highly vaxxed jurisdictions like the Bay Area saw huge and persistent waves of cases?

Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by stale2002 on Tuesday December 27, 2022 @12:49AM (#34145559)
> How do you come to this conclusion

Because there have been many many studies of the effect of the vaccine, in many different countries, by many different groups.

The results are overwhelmingly that the vaccine saves lives.

> saw huge and persistent waves of cases

This is a bad argument.

A vaccine can be useful, and save millions of lives, even if we falsely assume for the sake of argument that it doesn't reduce the amount of people who get infected or transmissibility.

Re:How Twitter Rigged the Covid Debate by MisterBastahrd on Tuesday December 27, 2022 @01:29AM (#34145808)
People were given billions of doses a year under supervision of doctors for actual cases where it made sense to take ivermectin. They weren't self-medicating with horse paste from agricultural feed stores like the idiots in the US.