Normally such a blatantly bad faith reply deserves nothing more than a downvote, but I'll add that all these comments are doing, earnestly, exactly what your opposition is arguing: you're applying naturalist and traditionalist fallacy to maintain a conservative status quo interpretation of gender.

What's funny is it's not even historically accurate: your "universal human" interpretation of masculine / feminine binary is simply not universal by any stretch of the imagination.

Look how easy this was, I googled "examples of non gender binary societies" and got a listicle with ten examples you can go learn more about: https://screenshot-media.com/politics/lgbtqi-rights/non-bina...