I actually think this is good since it means we postpone usage of, and thereby resistance to, any new antibiotics.
Unfortunately, antibiotics are the tragedy of the commons writ large, and we’ve been wasting them for minimal gain because even minor private benefit generally outweighs long term consequences.
Modern cities are a huge disease vector. That kind of population density lets sickness run rampant. Untreated TB has something like a 25% mortality rate, and we've already seen drug-resistant (DR) and extreme drug-resistant (XDR) strains of TB. An outbreak of TB that we have no antibiotics for would be devastating.
—-
> I actually think this is good since it means we postpone usage of, and thereby resistance to, any new antibiotics.
This is true if you use them in isolation but I thought broad spectrum antibiotics, aka many at once, is what is typical now to slow down development of resistance? In this case you’d want to develop a few new ones and deploy them in batch.
1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broad-spectrum_antibiotic
2: https://www.science.org/content/article/combining-antibiotic...
I can't say if there's a plethora of drugs just waiting to be released after CT requirements are lowered, but definitely there is less of an R&D incentive currently because pts who take antimicrobials only take them temporarily and cases where you need an advanced antimicrobial to deal with an AMR case are thankfully uncommon.
Edit: I think this is the specific bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3932...