News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by cm2187 on Sunday December 25, 2022 @06:40AM (#34126356)
A lot of the sample phone numbers seem to be some dummy number "+0000 2009". Is that a secret way around phone number requirement for twitter accounts?
Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by jacekpoz on Sunday December 25, 2022 @06:46AM (#34126382)
I think it's part of the account creation date, not all accounts have a phone number.
Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by cnowacek on Sunday December 25, 2022 @06:49AM (#34126405)
That’s the time zone offset and year of the “created at” timestamps.
Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by O__________O on Sunday December 25, 2022 @06:54AM (#34126435)
That’s just a date value, “+0000” means UTC and 2009 is the year. If the value is in the phone field, might be a glitch or hidden value stored in the phone field that has a meaning that is undocumented; for example that the account was created prior to the phone field being added, though that seems unlikely, since my understanding is Twitter started out as phone-based.
Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by whywhywhywhy on Sunday December 25, 2022 @07:28AM (#34126660)
No the phone requirement came way later.

You used to be able to sign up with just an email address then they started forcing phone number verification by lying and saying they caught your account acting like a bot so you needed to verify you’re human using phone number (you got the message even if you did nothing or just followed a few people, total lie)

Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by Eisenstein on Sunday December 25, 2022 @02:47PM (#34130524)
How did twitter start as an sms system without requiring phone numbers?
Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by whywhywhywhy on Tuesday December 27, 2022 @11:02AM (#34149803)
They pivoted away from being an SMS system and that became a legacy part of it, that still worked but wasn't essential.

The part where Twitter was SMS only is like a footnote in its history.

Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by O__________O on Tuesday December 27, 2022 @12:57PM (#34151454)
Point is that generally speaking databases rarely delete fields once added, especially field as valuable as a phone number; as such, my assumption is Twitter has had a field in their database for a user’s phone number since it was first released.

Twitter’s been collecting phone numbers since at least late 2006:

https://web.archive.org/web/20061103054924/http://twitter.co...

Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by Eisenstein on Wednesday December 28, 2022 @01:24PM (#34163995)
So what you are saying is that when they started they required phone numbers? As in, what the commenter I was replying to wrote was not true? The 'footnote' in history seems pretty important when the whole point is that ignoring it leads you to assume things that are wrong.
Re:Twitter API hacked, user database being sold online by Dawnyhf2 on Sunday December 25, 2022 @07:27AM (#34126651)
I’ve done something similar and my guess is they preformed a migration in 2009 and didn’t want to force current users to provide phone numbers so they used the default value as a placeholder/note that reminds them to special case these users who were grandfathered in under the old rules.