This is GP's point, AFAICT.

They're not hoarding grain or iron or silicon or network bandwidth - in fact the only reason they got rich in the first place is because they allocated these physical resources effectively to serve a wide group of people. (See AWS for example. The average computer runs at maybe 10% utilisation for 2 hours a day; whereas theirs are at a high utilisation 24/7.)

As you rightly said, the things that Bezos, Musk and Gates are "hoarding" is capital in the literal sense.

Their net worth isn't made of gold coins sitting in a swimming pool doing nothing, but car factories, server farms and massive logistics networks.

I want to point out that first of all, this isnt even a good comparison, because nobody is talking about just giving people a massive lump sum of cash. Its about putting the money back into the workers creating it, as well as public welfare systems to ensure future safety nets.

And second of all, even if we just gave the money away and people "pissed it away", the money is still being circulated and put back into the economy.

Of course it is easy to say 'put money back into workers creating it'. But the labor market is just that - a market, and no-one is being forced to give away their labor for free or less than it's worth.

If the tax code is riddled with tens of thousands of exceptions that incentivise a gazillion different behaviours, again, that's the will of the people asserting itself via the tax code. It's much harder to unpick those, right? Thus the highly enlightened conversation about making billionaries illegal and such.

> And second of all, even if we just gave the money away and people "pissed it away", the money is still being circulated and put back into the economy.

Yeah, that worked out great and totally did not result in historically high inflation that will now cause a recession with massive job losses (thus hurting the cause of the workers it purports to support). Also, the inflation is totally not a tax that will be paid mostly by poor people or those on fixed incomes.

So the average American wouldn't need to take in a homeless person. The homeless people could fit in ~3% of the vacant homes.

Obviously it's more complicated than that but sometimes capitalism does suck.

[1] https://bfi.uchicago.edu/insight/finding/the-size-and-census...

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/10/realestate/vacancy-rate-b...

But for me, your example is capitalism in the sense that people do it of their own free will. They give up their time and resources to help others without coercion or compulsion. Capitalism is freedom to me, and a natural state that exists outside of the state where people can interact freely with one another. What they do with it is another question entirely.

Others, however, equate capitalism with greed and evil though.

It's hard to run a soup kitchen with no food or volunteers.

44 billion dollars could take most if not all homeless people in this country and see them in apartments for a year.

A couple billion would feed every hungry child in the country.

3% of railroad company profits would give their workers 14 sick days instead of 0.

Theres an infinite amount of good that billionaires could do without even noticing the cost, but they choose not to.

Resource hoarding.

It's very easy to demand accountability of billionaires and supremely difficult to collectively hold our political leaders responsible. The law doesn't require billionaires to be accountable to the general public beyond obeying laws and paying taxes that are due, but our public representatives have higher standards to live up to, and our focus should be on them, not billionaires. All the wealth of American billionaires would add up to a couple years' federal budgets (or perhaps less than a year of federal and the top 4 populous states' budgets).

- The recipients get a greater share of existing resources.

- The changed demand changes supply accordingly. So there might be fewer private jets produced but more food produced, for instance. Thus future production changes too, and the economy is reshaped.

Why do you imagine these things wouldn’t happen?