“Research: The Average Age of a Successful Startup Founder Is 45”
https://hbr.org/2018/07/research-the-average-age-of-a-succes...
Discussion on HN here:
I'm sure they did a great job at researching that but it really does not match my experience at all. And I see a lot of start-ups (up to 50 / year) from the inside, at least a few hundred founders if not a 1000+ by now over the last 15 years. The bulk of the successful ones is late 20's to mid 30's.
The younger ones are not alone ( the successful 45/50+ parents/mentors/etc are supporting them financially and more ).
Otherwise, without the experience of your 20s and 30s you cannot understand the world, you haven't build the network you need to succeed ( I am my own example), basically you cannot manufacture you "luck".
- people in the VC entrepreneur world are seeing mostly 20s and 30s be successful
- VC world is, as one previous commenter put it, swing for the bleachers
- researchers are saying average age of success is 45, so more than half are 40+
This seems to perhaps indicate (though needs research) that
- those 40+ prefer bootstrapped businesses
- bootstrapped businesses are over half the successful entrepreneurs, so tend to be more successful
Many things could be wrong with this:
- different definitions of successful
- research bias
- geographical bias
However, it's something that seems to bear investigation.
And if true, what is it that is driving the budding entrepreneur to think that to be more successful they need to seek VC funding, when it may actually be the opposite. Would you rather take a 1 in 1m shot at 1m/yr, or a 1 in 10k shot at 300k/yr? Numbers made up in the question of course, research needed to figure out what they are.
Jeff Bezos?
This is a myth. It is purported because most of the 30+ entrepreneurs are not vocal about their successes.
You can do the math for yourself.
There are older, successful entrepreneurs, one guy I knew started his first company in his mid-50's and had a massive success but he's definitely the outlier. But most successful entrepreneurs I know started their first successful company in their 20's or 30's, rarely 40's. And most unsuccessful entrepreneurs have the exact same demographic...
A couple of things that I've seen really do help, but they still require a substantial investment in time and have an opportunity cost as well: work for one of the large, well paying companies for a while, save up a nest egg and use that as a jump off point if you weren't born into capital (though the risk of becoming addicted to that income stream is real and letting go of it will not be easy). Another is to first start a regular career in order to identify pain points in some industry or other and then later use that knowledge to create a product that addresses those pain points.
But that's not the kind of thing that you can spin out far enough for a book or a TED talk. I do believe that those two will increase your chances.