Re:Even the FBI says you should use an ad blocker
by wildrhythms on Thursday December 22, 2022 @12:22PM
(#34095831)
The more likely scenario is that browsers effectively ban or restrict ad blocker extensions. Apple already refuses to support browser extensions on their mobile OS, and Google does not allow extensions on Chrome mobile, and we already know mobile accounts for a significant portion of web traffic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Even the FBI says you should use an ad blocker
by chrisbolt on Thursday December 22, 2022 @12:26PM
(#34095893)
> Apple already refuses to support browser extensions on their mobile OS
My iOS Wipr extension begs to differ.
Re:Even the FBI says you should use an ad blocker
by dylan604 on Thursday December 22, 2022 @12:33PM
(#34095980)
This is one of those things that won't die like iOS can't copy&paste. Yes, both things were true for a painfully long time. They are no longer true now, so continuing to saying use these as examples is just moronic at this time.
Re:Even the FBI says you should use an ad blocker
by wildrhythms on Thursday December 22, 2022 @12:58PM
(#34096290)
The last time I looked at Wipr it still wouldn't let me block an individual element or set up my own filter. And what I'm calling a browser extension must be quite different from Apple's recent definition.
Re:Even the FBI says you should use an ad blocker
by Teever on Thursday December 22, 2022 @12:24PM
(#34095858)
> Apple already refuses to support browser extensions on their mobile OS
It's going to be interesting to see how Apple deals with this now that the EU is forcing them to allow users to install apps from alternate sources.