You are maybe not aware, that for stationary batteries, there are way more options than lithium based. Natrium for example, is quite common, so you can make literal saltwater batteries.
We can wait for some scientific advances, but it is whishful thinking to hope that in a few decades they will invent the ultimate solution.
Hydroelectric plants are the only large-scale storage, but they are highly dependent on the geology of the country.
They are not a solution to seasonal storage.
For me it is useless to go on all these big trips, the solution is very simple: mix of nuclear for base load, and renewable for peak.
Pumped hydro is not, in fact, "highly dependent on the geology of the country". It needs a hill. Hills are very common.
A "solution to seasonal storage" is not, in fact, needed or useful. NG backup works and will continue working into the indefinite future.
Good day.
No one will deploy seasonal storage, so the point is moot. NG backup works today, and will continue working into the indefinite future.
Chemical batteries are the most expensive of many storage alternatives, with advantages for very short-term use. Lithium is a poor choice for utility requirements, so its supply is irrelevant.
There is no place for nukes, which cost radically more than all other alternatives, most especially for only intermittent use.
I can predict you, that the wind on the sea is way stronger and stable, than on land, so your base assumption might be wrong.
(Offshore windparks are still not the solution of course.)