I mean, there might be effect, but do you have a quantification of these. Like maybe you get 0.1% more likely to catch cancer if you eat these mushroom, but when you compare that to the 300% more likely if you smoke then I think you're safe.

Why do we allow smoking but are scared of low dose radiations?

"Why do we allow smoking but are scared of low dose radiations? "

Because smoking is not mandatory for everyone, but a individual choice and you can sue people, whose smoking effects other people.

Radiation effects everyone.

And no one is scared of low dose radiation, but it is a symptom of what can happen.

Chernobyl was just one incident. Going 100% nuclear and with people still being people, this would mean more accidents, more radiation, more cancer.

>Radiation effects everyone.

So do emissions and by-products of mining, coal burning, battery tech. To a much higher extent if I may add.

> many people likely will get cancer sooner

Where did you get this from?

One of the nice things about nuclear is that you can literally Google radiation maps from various time period, plug that in to demographic maps and plug those numbers into the radiation->excess death models.

Turns out, lightning is something you should be worrying about more than living 10 miles from Fukishima.

"Where did you get this from?"

To be honest?

Not from deep research, but just from the known fact, that radiation increases cancer risk and that at Fukoshima was lots of radiation released.

"One of the nice things about nuclear is that you can literally Google radiation maps from various time period"

And there are different types of radiation. Some not so bad as background, or standing next to it, but very dangerous when eaten. I do not know when going in the forest and I do not want to walk around with a geiger counter. They still do not disclose how much wild boar meat has to be thrown away regulary in germany because of chernobyl.

And if the data in Japan does not show an increase, well then it is either all good (because most was washed into the sea) - or maybe not correct data. I don't know about the japanese government, but here in the east block after chernobyl, there was never a official problem in the first place. And the japanese government hopefully is better than the stalinists were, but bending the truth to save face, is a known motive there as well.

And the thing is, like I said, I am not anti nuclear. But solar panels and wind turbines simply do not have this problem ever.

Do you feel able to Google numbers, radiation breakdowns and formula to find out?