News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Checked C. Parent comment

Re:Checked C by bachmeier on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @05:12PM (#34087080)
There's no substitute for decades of having programmers giving you (and shouting at you) blunt feedback on your programming language proposals.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Checked C by WalterBright on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @07:43PM (#34088302)
People have never been shy with criticism!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Checked C by ryao on Thursday December 22, 2022 @03:10PM (#34097987)
I did not know who you were at first. Would you have any thoughts on why another group made Golang when D already existed that you would be willing to share?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Checked C by acehreli on Friday December 23, 2022 @12:05AM (#34102507)
Because Google saves us all.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Checked C by ntrel on Friday December 23, 2022 @06:02AM (#34104461)
Because Go designers don't like OOP and didn't want low-level system programming as core features. They also were not keen on generic programming. Basically they wanted a simpler language. (Then they realized generics are useful, ironically their constraints add complexity). Also they wanted a segmented stack and coroutines + channels as language features.
[ Parent | on HN ]