News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by rand0mx1 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @09:36AM (#34081232)
There are many users on HN with anti-science bias, data means nothing to them
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by coldtea on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @10:01AM (#34081528)
Yeah, and most of them root for Pfizer because "private for profit company == science"...
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by stonogo on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @02:48PM (#34085491)
I run in some fairly lefty circles and I can safely state I've never heard of anyone (of ANY political leaning) "root for Pfizer" edit: except their actual paid PR people.
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by mbg721 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @02:50PM (#34085507)
And anybody who holds significant shares of their stock.
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by stonogo on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @03:07PM (#34085729)
No, the folks I know are more likely to sell stock they don't like than cheer for it against their own principles. That's assuming they buy individual stocks, which most people don't.
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by mbg721 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @03:23PM (#34085919)
Those people don't hold an amount that's significant, though.
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by stonogo on Thursday December 22, 2022 @12:32AM (#34090169)
Thus we're a long way from the "most of them" I was replying to. Unless you're claiming that a majority of people hold a significant amount of Pfizer stock, I don't think we're disagreeing here?
Re:Pfizer Penalties Since 2000: $10B by dang on Thursday December 22, 2022 @04:11PM (#34098756)
"Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community." It's reliably a marker of bad comments and worse threads.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html