News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by smilekzs on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @02:53AM (#34077856)
For me, there's always a metallic residual taste in my water whenever I use a stainless steel bottle. Got tired and returned to using normal mugs.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by bayindirh on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @03:00AM (#34077892)
Which brand(s) did you use? I use Contigo, Stanley, Alaaddin and (old) Starbucks tumblers and bottles, and they leave no taste in the water.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by bushbaba on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @05:18AM (#34078820)
Many of the metal water bottles come with a plastic liner to avoid the metallic taste
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by atombender on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @07:03AM (#34079551)
Some also come with a non-stick (Teflon-type) coating. Zojirushi makes incredibly nice vacuum-insulated bottle [1] that unfortunately has a non-stick liner. The inside of the bottle is super easy to clean, but the chemicals used in the manufacturing are awful.

[1] https://www.zojirushi.com.hk/enproductsview.php?oid=6&tid=17...

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by jankeymeulen on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @09:05AM (#34080867)
Good you mention a teflon-type coating in a discussion about 'forever chemicals'.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by amluto on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @09:52AM (#34081420)
Zojirushi also makes them without the liner. It’s a choose-your-poison situation: the lined ones seem to perform much better with green tea.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by atombender on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @09:54AM (#34081451)
Interesting, I wasn't aware of that. What do you mean by "perform" here?
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by selimthegrim on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @11:58AM (#34083207)
Could be the green tea is made with slightly lower temperature water so less likely to leach chemicals off of the liner
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by amluto on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @11:02PM (#34089639)
In theory the liner is PTFE (or maybe a different fluoropolymer) with nothing left to leach out. PTFE and its relatives are stable to temperatures well above that of boiling water, so leaching shouldn’t be an issue.

(One big problem with PTFE is that it starts to slowly decompose at a lower temperature than its melting point. This makes it messy to work with. As I understand it, the decomposition products are gasses, so this is a problem at the factory and for the environment, but I don’t think its a problem for end users.)

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by amluto on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @04:03PM (#34086369)
Green teas seem to stop tasting good after a fairly short time stored in a stainless steel bottle.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by yourapostasy on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @05:55AM (#34079047)
If you’re sensitive to metallic residual taste, then look for containers made from a type of stainless that meets your needs. There are many kinds [1], I prefer 316 but you might need 321 for example. Some day I’ll engage a machinist to fab one up for me that uses standard gaskets I can get from any MRO firm in the world.

[1] https://www.brikksen.com/home/page/blog?p=the-different-grad...

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @06:14AM (#34079180)
Stainless steel starts with a metallic taste, but after first week of use it is usually gone. Also there is titanium and aluminium.

Or just get a reusable plastic one, perfect can be an enemy of good.

Individual use of plastic is not relevant, as long as it goes to landfil and not ends up in the ocean througg recycling fraud. In UK most plastic ends up sent to poland, where it's burnt or sent onwards to Turkey where it becomes untraceable. I stopped recycling plastic because the system cannot be trusted - at least if it stays in UK you know it wont be hurting anyone.

Half of plastic waste in the ocean waste is discarded fishing nets.

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by amluto on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @10:06AM (#34081581)
I once did a fair amount of experimentation and found titanium to impart a much stronger metallic taste than stainless steel.

Aluminum is not an amazing food contact surface — it’s quite reactive. I would not use an uncoated aluminum bottle for anything other than plain water.

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @12:45PM (#34083884)
I have never tried titanium, surprused to hear it does that.

The aluminium bottle I have is likely coated, I wouldn't know - i do use it just for water, and it seems fine.

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @12:45PM (#34083885)
I have never tried titanium, surprused to hear it does that.

The aluminium bottle I have is likely coated, I wouldn't know - i do use it just for water, and it seems fine.

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by feet on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @06:29AM (#34079278)
Glass is an option
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by Eisenstein on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @07:56AM (#34080101)
Glass with a silicone sleeve over it is surprisingly resilient. I have had a few glass bottles with silicone covers that I carry around (not all at once...) and have dropped them more times than I can recall and they always just bounce. Of course they can break, especially if you do something like put it in your shopping cart and drop something heavy on it (whoops).
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by dublin on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @09:32AM (#34081174)
The inertness of glass not only makes it always the first choice for food contact, it's also the most cleanly recycled material on the planet, when it does break. Unlike plastics (which for all practical purposes can't really be recycled), and metals, which require complex separation and realloying, glass can be easily separated visually and reused indefinitely. It is quite likely that the glass in your refrigerator right now contains glass first produced by the Romans.

(Of course, we should just reuse glass containers, like we did when I was a kid - a small deposit is a big motivator for kids to collect bottles for reuse!)

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by TylerE on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @01:03PM (#34084110)
Big caveat that all that recyclability really only works for clear glass.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by mensetmanusman on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @09:06AM (#34080875)
Glass is heavy and causes transportation tires to generate more micro plastics on the highway and has a higher co2 emission burden.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by zip1234 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @10:12AM (#34081664)
That's a good point. Need to stop subsidizing over the road trucking and build more rail. Much more efficient.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by feet on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @10:42AM (#34082098)
More than steel? We're talking about reusable bottles here, shipped empty. What is the comparison of empty glass or steel to full plastic? What is the difference in mass?
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by fomine3 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @07:28PM (#34088210)
Why not aluminum
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by nebopolis on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @12:45PM (#34083892)
There exist industrial reaction vessels etc which are made of stainless steel with a bonded liner made of glass. That seems like the ideal "forever" food container material to me - chemically nonreactive and easy to clean, but lightweight and resilient to impact. The glass layer would be lost in recycling, but it shouldn't impede recycling the metal too badly as it'd just be a tiny bit more slag in the crucible.