Re:January 1, 2023 is Public Domain Day: Works from 1927 are...
by sfifs on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @08:17PM
(#34075452)
Life expectancy is 2.5X what it was when these laws were first conceived and the majority of creative people have a relatively short peak creative period where most of their valuable output comes - eg. Typical recording artists last no more than 10 years & to be able to achieve their peak, they have to often give up on things that promise stable careers for people (advanced college degrees, internships and starter roles in the 20s) not in the creative industry. So why not let them enjoy the benefits of their creativity through royalty in their old age if someone streams their song decades later? There are a lot of senior artists who would be facing very significant hardship if not for their royalties. You can see this much more often in athletes who don't have a royalty stream.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:January 1, 2023 is Public Domain Day: Works from 1927 are...
by p1necone on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @08:57PM
(#34075766)
What about a compromise where the original works (and republishing verbatim) are protected for the life of the creator, but derivative works (e.g. writing a new novel with the same characters/setting) is only protected for 10-20 years?
Re:January 1, 2023 is Public Domain Day: Works from 1927 are...
by thehappypm on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @09:17PM
(#34075907)
Life expectancy was mostly shorter due to infant mortality. The average person who made it to 5 years old didn’t have an expectation to die at 35 at all.