Re:A collection of Soviet control rooms
by smm11 on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @05:06PM
(#34073369)
f8 and be there.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
For the "f/8 and be there" philosophy of getting a usable shot at all, I agree with the simplicity of having a sensible default, and of course with the importance of being where the story is. In the digital era, and as a student/amateur who often kept the strobe in the bag, I'd modify that to "f/4 and be there".
f/4 with autofocus, aperture-priority automatic exposure, ISO 400 gave great images, with faster exposure (less likely to have motion blur when I didn't want it, and faster bursts, more forgiving of lower light) and shallower depth-of-field (for making the subject pop).
(I think of f/8 as being near hyperfocal distance for having anything in field of view in focus, and probably near an image quality sweet spot of the lens, but also often being slow for non-studio use unless you were using a strobe.)
Re:A collection of Soviet control rooms
by CWuestefeld on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @08:19PM
(#34075465)
I'd modify that to "f/4 and be there".
Sure, because my micro 4/3 sensor has a crop factor of 2:1, so when I set to f4, I'm effectively getting a 35mm f8.
Re:A collection of Soviet control rooms
by cat_plus_plus on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @02:13AM
(#34077600)
Said someone who only takes pictures in broad daylight. Even with modern tech and 100 watt light bulbs, you get enough motion blur and/or noise to ruin most shots indoors. With film that maxed out at ISO 800 and enlarger as the only postprocessing tool, forget it.