News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by xg15 on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @07:10AM (#34064806)
> This is what's known in the sports world as "flopping" - feigning an injury to elicit a penalty on the other team.

Nitpick, there are two kinds of "flopping" in sports, which you can both observe e.g. in soccer.

One is to simulate a made-up foul as you say, basically trying to mislead the referee into giving an unjustified penalty. This is clearly illegal and constitutes a foul itself.

However, often players flop to highlight fouls that actually happened but were so subtle or hard to see that the referee missed them.

The results are still ridiculous - Ronaldo rolling in pain on the grass because the other player had briefly pulled his jersey - but the greater strategy here is valid: If small, subtle fouls went unpunished, they'd be an easy way to gain an unfair advantage for your team. So the game would very quickly turn into a contest of how to hide fouls best from the referee. By highlighting fouls to a ridiculous degree, players are counteracting this.

Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by skeeter2020 on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @09:32AM (#34066404)
>> If small, subtle fouls went unpunished, they'd be an easy way to gain an unfair advantage for your team. So the game would very quickly turn into a contest of how to hide fouls best from the referee.

Only in soccer, and even then only with particular types of players... I don't know how to describe them without using any of these words...

Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by jocaal on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @09:56AM (#34066705)
A world where small and subtle fouls are continuously punished sounds pretty scary to me.