Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative

Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by iinnPP on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @06:55AM (#34064663)

People who are good at hurting you with words do not use words like the ones in the list.

Also, the assault example may be valid in your jurisdiction, but in mine it isn't assault but threats of violence. additionally, the threat must be made in a way that is threatening.

Your example, using my local laws, doesn't make sense.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by Eisenstein on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @07:09AM (#34064800)

I never said anything about the list, I said your argument could be better.

I really wish people would address the content of a discussion instead of what they want to be discussing.

I don't know what laws you are talking about because do not define them, nor your locality.

Regardless, there is a 'for instance' in my reply, and you addressed that specific notion instead of the core.

[ Parent | on HN ]