News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by reso on Thursday December 29, 2011 @03:40PM (#3405299)
The TechCrunch crew has a long history of "calling out" major companies on their product decisions, in the absence of any of the data or context in which such complex decisions are made.

P.S. I love how Tom has turned into the elder statesman of social networks.

Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by commnderkeen08 on Thursday December 29, 2011 @04:05PM (#3405389)
Not to mention MG Siegler's long history of calling out Google. Always skeptical.

But totally loving the elder statesman analogy. Best part about Tom"s reply is his own humility--Myspace having "decent" technology.

Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by rhizome on Thursday December 29, 2011 @04:30PM (#3405472)
Not to mention MG Siegler's long history of self-promotion.
Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by ryguytilidie on Thursday December 29, 2011 @09:33PM (#3406338)
not to mention EVERY TECHCRUNCH WRITER's long history of self-promotion.

/fyp

Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by rhizome on Friday December 30, 2011 @12:21PM (#3408276)
I have never seen any story like "ROBIN WAUTERS WONDERS WHY ROBIN WAUTERS ISN'T IN THE HEADLINES," like you see multiple times per week with MG...on HN. Is he the most gossipy person there, now? This is usually the kind of drama you see with Perez Hilton type personalities.
Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by tincholio on Saturday December 31, 2011 @11:24AM (#3411161)
Well, we had those with Arrington, but fortunately he seems to have "vanished" from the HN mind...
Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by rhizome on Saturday December 31, 2011 @03:36PM (#3411764)
That's a good point: MG might just be bored because he doesn't have enough interesting work to do, so he's going to stink up the place until people give him work/money/cocktail-weenies.
Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by Cl4rity on Thursday December 29, 2011 @05:01PM (#3405577)
What I loved most was Tom's handling of putting out MG's little fire: "You are a loveable renegade. :-)" and also "clearing not roaming the badlands." MG does come off as trying a little too hard to sound tough/badass on Twitter and elsewhere.
Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by evilmushroom on Thursday December 29, 2011 @05:10PM (#3405612)
MG Siegler is like the Fox News of TechCrunch on top of that.
Re:Dear MG Siegler, Are you seriously upset about your photo? by doktrin on Thursday December 29, 2011 @10:48PM (#3406503)
Frankly, I've grown increasingly disinterested in anything TechCrunch(ers) have to say. Siegler's pieces in particular remind me of partisan political editorials.