Re:Nuclear physicist explains why fusion ignition is hailed ...
by throwawaymaths on Monday December 19, 2022 @09:46AM
(#34052610)
It's not even close to net positive. It's more energy out than the lasers put in. But the lasers take in WAAAAY more than they put in.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nuclear physicist explains why fusion ignition is hailed ...
by felipellrocha on Monday December 19, 2022 @11:46AM
(#34054234)
What are you talking about? They put in 2MJs of energy in, and got back 3.5MJs out?
Re:Nuclear physicist explains why fusion ignition is hailed ...
by russdill on Monday December 19, 2022 @01:06PM
(#34055331)
They lasers are about 1% efficient. The actual energy required is hundreds of MJ.
Re:Nuclear physicist explains why fusion ignition is hailed ...
by throwawaymaths on Monday December 19, 2022 @02:50PM
(#34056742)
If your "they" refers to the lasers, the lasers put in 2mj, correct. That is not what "they" (my they) put in to the lasers.