Twitter Suspends PG's Account

Re:Twitter Suspends PG's Account by sytelus on Sunday December 18, 2022 @05:20PM (#34044266)

Where interpretation of "casually" and "occasional" is left to the Emperor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter Suspends PG's Account by seydor on Sunday December 18, 2022 @05:48PM (#34044863)

there was always an emperor

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter Suspends PG's Account by jacquesm on Sunday December 18, 2022 @05:51PM (#34044925)

No, in the past there was a committee. There is zero evidence that the previous CEO of Twitter personally judged who was and who was not to be banned.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter Suspends PG's Account by hackernewds on Sunday December 18, 2022 @06:30PM (#34045586)

The previous CEO of Twitter barely did any work. It was frequent to hear chickens and birds in the background of Jack's video calls.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter Suspends PG's Account by jacquesm on Sunday December 18, 2022 @09:02PM (#34047349)

> The previous CEO of Twitter barely did any work.

I wished the current one was half as clever.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter Suspends PG's Account by Ferrotin on Sunday December 18, 2022 @05:54PM (#34044990)

We know that was Vijaya and Roth. Bringing up Dorsey is transparent sleight of hand.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter Suspends PG's Account by dm319 on Sunday December 18, 2022 @06:10PM (#34045253)

And what interpretation of 'absurd in the extreme' should we take?

[ Parent | on HN ]