Re:Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion
by codeflo on Sunday December 18, 2022 @07:59AM
(#34037282)
> Is this worse than trusting Twitter, Facebook, or TikTok?
Yes for the first two, no for the third. US-based companies are large targets for potential lawsuits, and consequently have processes in place to prevent random employees from accessing your DMs without cause. I obviously wouldn't trust those companies completely -- we're really arguing about probabilities here -- but there's at least some measure of accountability that makes them unlikely to do something trivially stupid.
> there are no private messages on Mastodon
It does have a DM feature -- that they aren't private is exactly the point.
It's not about them being read, it's about them being used against me. Being scraped and weaponised to train some algorithm to exploit me. That's the issue I have.
Re:Twitter's anti-Mastodon filter evasion
by vidarh on Sunday December 18, 2022 @02:10PM
(#34041554)
In terms of local timeline inclusion that kind-of already muddies things, but WebFinger does provide for aliases and supports forwarding, so maybe the ability to have accounts on multiple instances but have them all forward to the same "follows"/"following" lists might work (likely not without changes, and there are many potential pitfalls there, though).
However.
> you're basically required to trust your online identity and private message secrecy to an anonymous activist admin with a kitty avatar.
Is this worse than trusting Twitter, Facebook, or TikTok? Those companies are actively looking to exploit you for profit. Whereas strawman kitty avatar can't do anything. Especially are there are no private messages on Mastodon.