Your second attempt of paraphrasing my comment is still way off the mark.
It wasn’t a long comment, so maybe you should take it at face value rather than trying to change it to suit your argument.
It wasn’t a long comment, so maybe you should take it at face value rather than trying to change it to suit your argument.
My point is the dynamic I mention explains the problems of wework, and is not proved wrong by the argument you put forward, paraphrased, that "businesses have evaluated long-term risk of renting at wework so wework is not at risk"