News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Peter Norvig critically reviews AlphaCode's code quality by pishpash on Friday December 16, 2022 @07:58PM (#34022932)
Are you sure there is an actual "thought-process [sic] of humans"? Witnesses have made up explanations for false memories, the same as in a dream.
Re:Peter Norvig critically reviews AlphaCode's code quality by galaxyLogic on Friday December 16, 2022 @08:08PM (#34023026)
I am not sure. But humans can often explain the thought-process that led them to a certain decision. I think that counts as evidence of consciousness., in humans.
Re:Peter Norvig critically reviews AlphaCode's code quality by skirmish on Friday December 16, 2022 @08:25PM (#34023189)
Humans can explain rational thought, sure, but not subconscious or acting on impulse. When you say something you shouldn't have said, how do you explain the thought process that led you to saying it? Were you an unconscious actor when you unwisely started an argument with your manager?
Re:Peter Norvig critically reviews AlphaCode's code quality by galaxyLogic on Friday December 16, 2022 @09:51PM (#34023883)
Yes you can be conscious about having been unconscious earlier. We do have reflexes. But we also have consciousness about our own thinking.