Waymo's collision avoidance testing

Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing by wongarsu on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @05:32PM (#33991637)

So far nobody really cared how road markings, signs etc look outside of the human visual spectrum, so there's likely a lot more variation there. Both in terms of how things look like when new, and in terms of acceptable wear.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing by taeric on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @05:40PM (#33991747)

Right. But that is in designing the existing roads. I'm talking about the cars. And I'm specifically asking why not adding more options? I don't mind a camera being part of the solution at all. Gives an obvious path to human labeling of training data. But, why not have more?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing by pclmulqdq on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @08:37PM (#33993854)

We have a good idea how all this stuff looks in the infrared spectrum, and that could help a lot in the sensor fusion.

[ Parent | on HN ]