Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing
by peder on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @03:12PM
(#33989654)
The leveling system is a bit off. Level 3 doesn't mean "better" than Level 2. A Level 2 system might actually offer the best safety profile of any of the Levels. That's what I'm getting at: there's a lot of runway in Level 2 systems, and I think they'll be so good that it will kill momentum for Level 3+ systems.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing
by masklinn on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @03:36PM
(#33990130)
The problem is that when a level 2 system gets too smart it can confuse drivers and lead to bad reactions in response.
e.g. let's say you have a level 2 system which starts auto-evading, suddenly steering without user input, the user is likely to reflexively try counter-steering in response.
Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing
by SoftTalker on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @03:31PM
(#33990048)
Yes. Eliminating or vastly reducing the head-on collisions caused by drivers drifting across the center line, and the rear-end collisions where they don't see the stopped or slow car ahead of them, are a huge win. I'd trade full self-driving for really effective lane departure warnings and auto-braking collision avoidance any day of the week. Next step (or included) would be reacting to red lights/stop signs if it appears that the driver is not stopping. Deal with those things well and you've eliminated the causes of most serious accidents.