If stochastic terrorism is speech that makes violent acts against an individual or group more likely, isn't ElonJet engaging in stochastic terrorism by making it easier for a radicalized crazy person to find Elon and harm him in real life?

I personally think the concept of stochastic terrorism is a rhetorical trick to associate legal speech with terrorism, but I think the argument applies just as well to ElonJet.

This would be a believable argument iff Elon had to deal with legitimated threats on his life in direct connection to ElonJet's operation. Since there's no evidence to back this up, it's a false equivalence.

He is alleging that is exactly what happened: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944

Sorry, but I only see cars in this clip. I'm not sure how jet tracking relates so you're going to have to explain that part to me. Until then I'm going to continue to justifiably assert that the two are unrelated.

Stochastic terrorism is a such bullshit concept, only designed to prevent examination of some political ideologies.

Surely you need to provide some details to justify such an accusation.

Hahahaha is this a joke?

> stochastic terrorism

This is an interesting term that is worth exploring. A problem with it is that it could apply to huge swaths of people and organizations, e.g. Fox News, the Republican Party, CNN, Democratic Socialists, etc

What absolute garbage.

Basically anything that you don’t like is now considered terrorism.

Free speech is completely dead under this logic.