Re:SBF Written Testimony Notes 12/12/2022
by jlarocco on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @12:10PM
(#33986493)
I can't speak for the others, but the free version of Slack keeps all of your chat data indefinitely. Paying customers can view it, free users can't.
Presumably the authorities would get the data from Slack directly.
Re:SBF Written Testimony Notes 12/12/2022
by flaviut on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @12:18PM
(#33986591)
that's a screenshot of signal, so the only way the any of the old stuff can be retrieved is if one of the participants saved it outside of signal.
Re:SBF Written Testimony Notes 12/12/2022
by dylan604 on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @03:04PM
(#33989488)
Doesn't the fact that one of them has screen shots speak volumes in and of itself? Just not sure what it is saying.
Re:SBF Written Testimony Notes 12/12/2022
by xwolfi on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @01:59PM
(#33988285)
In the bank I work in, we were fined $200M along with many competitors, because we didnt keep whatsapp records for 10 years, which impedes transparency during timeline reconstruction for investigations.
I think SBF is crucified on this alone.
Re:SBF Written Testimony Notes 12/12/2022
by bushbaba on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:59PM
(#33989385)
Yes there is. Hence the attorney client privileged header for sensitive matters. and. General sense that sensitive topics should be discussed over a non recorded medium. Mostly because they could be taken out of context at a future date
In fact, how does data retention rules specifically apply to apps that don't have large data retention or specifically have no data retention. Besides just making it harder to operate, are there penalties for companies using things like free version of Slack with short windows, or Snapchat/Telegram/Signal with self destructing messages?