News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by nlh on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @09:48PM (#33979425)
It's infuriating for sure, but unfortunately it's the reality. If you gained from a Ponzi scheme that means you literally were given other peoples' money (directly).

I fully empathize with the absolutely epic degree it must SUCK to get a call and be told "yeah that 10% you've been earning for the past 20 years was actually someone else's money, you need to give it back."

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by factsarelolz on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @10:36PM (#33979711)
Assuming you cashed out, wouldn't it be something like "that 10% you earned 10 years ago" because if you never cashed out then you're not liable.

My reply would be along the lines of: "Sorry lost it all in MtGox/FTX/Crypto/Vegas/Horses"

Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by HWR_14 on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @11:53PM (#33980144)
I mean, if the courts say you owe the money, you owe the money. If you lost it, looks like you got some debt to repay somehow.
Re:The United States of America vs. Samuel Bankman-Fried Ind... by mensetmanusman on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @09:45AM (#33984112)
The court would argue you didn’t complete due diligence and are liable for your mistake due to a crime taking place.