If the above examples are what you label "not aligned with leftist politics" then sure

Not sure why you would define not being a shitty human being as "leftist" but I guess the strength of language is its malleability so have at it

yeah, man.. I got muscled out of The Left for wearing masks too early in the pandemic, but I don't feel like it's controversial to say that Pizzagate and QAnon are "weird"

Cool story bro. But don't blame other people for "muscling you out" of your principles. It's on you.

I'd still call myself a leftist. But like pretty much all rational people who've done any introspection at all: I'm now an alt right maniac because I'm willing to talk to people I disagree with and try to think things through from their perspective.

I masked up early since people wear masks in hospitals and people mask up in Asia when they're sick. That made me "anti-science"

I think free speech is actually important even if scumbags lie to people. I think that the government shouldn't have the ability to arbitrarily decide what is and isn't true from one day to the next, and they DEFINITELY shouldn't have this much soft power to shut down unwanted narratives through backchannels.

What's really funny about all this is that I can talk to my actual hard-right friends about this stuff, and they don't rage on me for being pro-trans or any other views they disagree about. We can talk about it, find the root of our disagreement, and then live in peace. The only Leftists I can get to that point with are others like myself who've been muscled out and branded dangerous alt-right lunatics.

I think being against feminism and proud to be heterosexual are perfectly acceptable, if controversial opinions. Being insulting about it is not.

Believing in well debunked conspiracy theories is your right, but doing so definitely puts you in the "weirdo" category.

Saying that feminism might be corrupted by grifters who do not actually seek equality between the genders would be controversial, but acceptable.

Saying that homosexual pride was important at the start, but now in most places gay people have the identical rights to straight people, and therefore gay pride is no more meaningful than straight pride would be controversial, but acceptable.

Missing either context by saying you're against feminism ("So you do NOT support equality between genders?") or that straight pride is the same as gay pride ("You do understand that 'pride' in this context is a rebellion against 'SHAME'. People are saying they refuse to be ASHAMED of being gay. Noone has ever told a straight person they should be ashamed of being straight") is not acceptable.

It is bigotry. There are left-wing bigots and right-wing bigots. And there are right wingers who are not bigots.

But there are definitely correlations and trends between bigotry and political beliefs...

We obviously have different definitions of "acceptable".

A few grifters do not cancel out all women's rights to equality.

Calling out racism when you see it, and when somebody shows you they're racist, as Notch unquestionably did, is acceptable.

Keeping your mouth shut and not saying anything isn't acceptable, and makes you a part of it.

Tolerating and normalizing racism is not acceptable.

And your claim that "gay people have the identical rights to straight people" is absolute mendacious bullshit and you know it, especially in light of the fact that so many people in the US are campaigning and bullying and legislating so strongly against it, and actually murdering gay people in their safe spaces.

It doesn't matter that they may technically finally have hard won and constantly embattled "identical rights", if they're dead.

I am sure you are fully aware of the numerous recent mass shootings targeting gay people, the thugs threatening drag shows, the terrorists shooting out power substations, and of the members of congress, former presidents, and presidential candidates who regularly incite that violence, so you definitely know you're lying about that.

So why do you lie and pretend to be ignorant, if you're not an active part of the problem?

Just remember: you're defending an unhinged billionaire Q-Anon promoting weirdo who publicly attacked and called a female game developer a "cunt", and people opposed to right wing neo-Nazi homophobic trolls "complete fucking cunts who deserve to be shot".

Notch was LITERALLY INCITING VIOLENCE, by any definition of the term, and you're defending him, after so many of those people he called "complete fucking cunts who deserve to be shot" were shot down in cold blood, just like he insisted.

Him saying that and you defending his hate speech is not just "weird", it's sociopathic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_pride

>Support for straight pride events is often based on religious objections to homosexuality.[16][32] Groups such as the White Aryan Resistance and Ku Klux Klan have also tried to oppose "gay pride" by stressing straight pride.[33]

[33] White Boys to Terrorist Men: Target Recruitment of Nazi Skinheads https://studysites.sagepub.com/martin3study/articles/Blazak....

https://thinkprogress.org/organizers-behind-boston-straight-...

>The organizers behind Boston’s Straight Pride Parade should concern you. Some of the organizers are close to neo-Nazis and other white supremacists.

You're arguing with the wrong person - you should reply to OP.

I completely agree with you. Notch is indefensible.

My argument was that there MIGHT be an acceptable way to have a conversation about what grifters are doing to feminism (without abandoning the whole concept)

Or there MIGHT be an acceptable way to have a conversation about whether gay pride should evolve as society evolves.

But not by saying you're against feminism, or by saying you're against gay pride without qualifications.

You can be not aligned with leftist politics without being racist and participating in GamerGate by calling female game designers "cunts".

Or are you admitting that right wing politics are racist and sexist by definition? You be you!

> Or are you admitting that right wing politics are racist and sexist by definition? You be you!

This is exactly what they're doing. The right loves to tell on themselves.

I long ago gave up on trying to assume good faith or reasonableness. It's much simpler to just listen to what they tell you about themselves and believe it.

Hunh. So if someone has a #killallmen hashtag I should take them at their word?

Just looking to see if consistency is expected or abhorred here.