Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by zbobet2012 on Monday December 12, 2022 @03:51PM
(#33960091)
Yes, _but_ the problem of generating laser light efficiently has and is being
solved for elsewhere. Which is why the NIF didn't focus on, or update their lasers. This is a major problem for semiconductor lithography for example, and receives literally tens of billions in investment every year and one which has lasers that are already 20x more efficient than the ones used by the NIF.
The real question in the experiments here at NIF was about whether inertial confinement fusion would work. This is very promising progress.
Also NIF spends a good portion of its time on weapons research, not fusion power so it's only been a recent focus.
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by JStanton617 on Monday December 12, 2022 @03:34PM
(#33959882)
The loss just on the lasers is 100x (i.e. delivered power is 1% of the input energy). Add in a combined cycle effeciency of only 50%, you're looking at needing a 200x improvement to have commercially relevant "net gain"
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by DennisP on Monday December 12, 2022 @03:42PM
(#33959983)
Yes but NIF's lasers date back to the 1990s, and laser technology has improved a lot since then. NIF-class lasers with over 20% efficiency are available now.
https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/pt.6.2.2021102...
Same article mentions that some petawatt lasers can fire more than once per second now.
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by sbierwagen on Monday December 12, 2022 @04:26PM
(#33960591)
>Add in a combined cycle effeciency of only 50%
Some reactor designs let you harvest electricity directly from charged ions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_energy_conversion
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab
by raylad on Monday December 12, 2022 @04:56PM
(#33960999)
Not only that, but the capsules that are used for the experiment are expensive and difficult to produce. And you'd have to be continuously blasting new ones for each burst of energy you want to generate.
Taking those costs into account, being able to use this method to generate power seems really non-optimal.
emphasis, etc