Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by sudomatic on Monday December 12, 2022 @01:41AM
(#33951660)
I think it's important to remember that just because something is easier to deal with, it doesn't necessarily mean it's better. The fact that AIs may be more pleasant to interact with than some humans doesn't mean that they are better equipped to govern us. In fact, I would argue that it is precisely the challenges and difficulties that come with dealing with other humans that make us better, more resilient, and more capable as a society.
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by ramraj07 on Monday December 12, 2022 @02:07AM
(#33951799)
Isn’t this true for pretty much all democracy too? Almost all elected politicians are not the best just the easiest or convenient to deal and agree with for the majority..
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by beebeepka on Monday December 12, 2022 @02:20AM
(#33951878)
Thanks for deciding for us. I greatly appreciate people who overuse "we" when expressing their own thoughts.
I would take rude, well-intentioned jerks to kindly speaking devils seeking to deceive me. Have a good one in your pod, though
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by goatlover on Monday December 12, 2022 @04:47AM
(#33952809)
Do you trust the companies training and running the AIs to happily guide you and society along?
Re:Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?
by lonelyasacloud on Monday December 12, 2022 @04:03AM
(#33952517)
Unlikely, at least one of the Trumpbot/Bidenbot/Polibots will be against pod entry for whatever financial/religous/gut feeling/.. reasons they've been trained on.
The AIs aren't going to take over by force, it'll be because they're just nicer to deal with than real humans. Before long, we'll let AIs govern us, because the leaders we choose for ourselves (e.g. Trump) are so awful that it'll be easier to compromise on an AI.
Before long, we'll all be happy to line up to get installed into Matrix pods.