The kind of "evidence" that is normally presented is typically provided by 3rd-rate activist researchers, attracted to dogma, and who simply come to whatever conclusion perpetuates that dogma.

I've made claims here and presented clear evidence. You called it "nonsense" with no substantiation other than vague gestures toward Christians (which Christians?) being targeted (how?) for their beliefs (which beliefs?)

I understand that you're trying to drag me down to the meta level so you can beat me with experience, but I'm not willing to take the bait here, sorry.

You've just pulled up a bit of dross from a highly partisan organisation and are claiming that this is proof of something.

It would be like me quoting fox news as proof.

I checked your post history. It's pretty clear you are deep in an alternate reality. I hope you can find your way out of it some day.