Re:The Twitter Files Part 2: Twitter's Secret Blacklists
by howinteresting on Saturday December 10, 2022 @08:21PM
(#33938970)
So you still don't have any evidence for your claims then?
I've made claims here and presented clear evidence. You called it "nonsense" with no substantiation other than vague gestures toward Christians (which Christians?) being targeted (how?) for their beliefs (which beliefs?)
I understand that you're trying to drag me down to the meta level so you can beat me with experience, but I'm not willing to take the bait here, sorry.
Re:The Twitter Files Part 2: Twitter's Secret Blacklists
by lazyeye on Saturday December 10, 2022 @09:50PM
(#33939582)
Neither of us has provided meaningful evidence. We are already on the same level. I havent dragged you anywhere.
You've just pulled up a bit of dross from a highly partisan organisation and are claiming that this is proof of something.
It would be like me quoting fox news as proof.
Re:The Twitter Files Part 2: Twitter's Secret Blacklists
by howinteresting on Sunday December 11, 2022 @03:21AM
(#33941316)
A judgment made by a federal court in the United States is "a bit of dross", apparently.
I checked your post history. It's pretty clear you are deep in an alternate reality. I hope you can find your way out of it some day.
The kind of "evidence" that is normally presented is typically provided by 3rd-rate activist researchers, attracted to dogma, and who simply come to whatever conclusion perpetuates that dogma.