News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by iLoveOncall on Saturday December 10, 2022 @10:43AM (#33933541)
Yes, and lossless JPEG doesn't matter, especially on the web.
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by adgjlsfhk1 on Saturday December 10, 2022 @11:28AM (#33933915)
lossless matters for lots of images on the web (like logos and other images with text). lossless jpeg recompression is also really useful because it allows CDNs to save bandwidth by replacing jpeg with jpeg-xl.
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by KronisLV on Saturday December 10, 2022 @11:54AM (#33934154)
> lossless matters for lots of images on the web (like logos and other images with text)

Couldn't some make the point that SVG can be a better format for things like that, especially logos? After all, raster graphics will always have drawbacks when compared to vector graphics for things like logos and other non-photographic content.

Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by layer8 on Saturday December 10, 2022 @12:40PM (#33934642)
On lower-DPI displays, which remain very widespread outside of mobile, vector graphics usually look worse than pixel graphics.
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by croes on Saturday December 10, 2022 @10:52AM (#33933616)
Even with losses it's better than WebP.
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by JyrkiAlakuijala on Saturday December 10, 2022 @06:41PM (#33938273)
and AVIF