Re:A 100MW solar farm in Texas will mount panels directly on...
by gregoriol on Saturday December 10, 2022 @05:15AM
(#33931434)
The best areas for solar are hot, those are also likely to be the areas where water supply is the most constrained, so this is definitely a no-go solution
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A 100MW solar farm in Texas will mount panels directly on...
by Pigalowda on Saturday December 10, 2022 @07:49AM
(#33932160)
This is in Texas which is hot but there’s water.
Additionally power stations use steam turbines which require a lot of water. Some cooling water for misters would probably be a rounding error.
Re:A 100MW solar farm in Texas will mount panels directly on...
by pooper on Saturday December 10, 2022 @05:41AM
(#33931534)
Sorry if this is too basic of a question but for places close enough to the sea, would sea water for cooling and cleaning be an option? Too much salt residue?
Re:A 100MW solar farm in Texas will mount panels directly on...
by 2ICofafireteam on Saturday December 10, 2022 @10:48AM
(#33933585)
Now I'm waiting for the seaside solar power plant/salt works proposal to pop up!
Seriously: Maybe residue wouldn't be an issue if it was never allowed to dry, but the corrosion-proof construction, drainage system, and pumping costs would be considerable. Then there's the 100 problems we're not aware of yet...
Re:A 100MW solar farm in Texas will mount panels directly on...
by nkmnz on Saturday December 10, 2022 @05:54AM
(#33931578)
salt crusts are highly reflective, driving down light exposure pretty fast. Plus, salt water is corrosive.
Re:A 100MW solar farm in Texas will mount panels directly on...
by danuker on Saturday December 10, 2022 @06:11AM
(#33931640)
> salt crusts are highly reflective
I think this will not be a problem, as the salt would be continuously washed away with new water. But the corrosion would be a problem indeed.
Maybe some plastic/epoxy/glass casing would help, but it might also hinder recyclability.