Compared to the early days of the net (4 decades ago), there's already an amazing amount of low-quality generated content that is being uploaded just for the numbers. Will in-silico generation make that worse than wetware generation? At the moment I'm somewhat optimistic that as the machine generated content now has a better grasp of spelling and grammar, it may eventually prove more coherent than any of the least-coherent wetware sources.

In the best case, people with good ideas but poor articulation could use AI (as a far far cheaper substitute for wetware legal counsel) to put their arguments in succinct and lucid forms.