> ANSWER
> To mix two colors in JavaScript, you can use the color-mix property. This property takes three parameters: the colorspace, the color to be mixed, and the percentage of that color to mix. For example, to mix the colors #FFFFFF and #8FBC8, you would use the following code:
> let newColor = document.createElement;
> // Outputs: #8FBC8
This is all just wrong from beginning to end. It seems to be confusing JS and CSS, too.
"How do I mix two colors in vanilla JavaScript?" This doesn't confuse rgb string and it still asks the same question.
Nothing much has changed since. So they appear to be trying to cash in on the interest in ChatGPT.
Interesting they didn't include that they are backed by Y Combinator in the recent S23 cohort. Is being backed by YC a negative for startups here now?
> what is the diameter of the sun in sun radii
> ANSWER
> The diameter of the sun in solar radii is 1,392,000 km. This is calculated by taking the mean radius of the sun, which is 432,450 miles , and multiplying it by the circumference of the sun, which is 2,715,396 miles .
The correct answer is, of course: 2.
BTW: Google is also confused, but not in the same way, returning:
2.0018 R(sun)
2 * 695700 = 1391400
based on the most recent measurement from 2015:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radius
Any other value found on the web is based on some older estimate or some arbitrary approximation.
The nominal solar radius, which is and is intended to be an approximation, is defined to be exactly 695,700 km.
ANSWER The path integral of a European swallow is the sum, or functional integral, over an infinity of quantum-mechanically possible trajectories to compute a quantum amplitude. This formulation has proven crucial to the understanding of how birds fly and migrate. For example, during migration, barn swallows cover 200 miles a day at speeds of 17-22 miles per hour, with a maximum flight speed of 35 mph. In their wintering areas, they feed in small flocks which join together to form roosting flocks of thousands of birds.
I asked some controversial questions and the answers are interesting to say the least. The source is often reddit, random sites that are probably the top search engine result or some yellow press outlet.
I make the phone calls to gather and synthesise information that previously wasn't online. I don't like the idea of AI just paraphrasing my work without credit, and getting it wrong to top things off. It's bad enough when Google and lazy SEO copywriters do it. I do the work, they get the value.
I feel the same as a programmer (though I'm no longer a professional one). I didn't release all that open source code to train a for-profit AI.
I'd be even more upset if an AI was used to immitate my artwork and deny me the recognition. Thankfully I'm not that skilled.
I've seen convincing counter arguments to this, but I can't help feeling wronged by it. I feel like it enables a few to rob many of the fruits of their labour at an unprecedented scale.
"Additionally, he was offered a high enough price by the shareholders that they were willing to sell their shares to him."
or:
"He acquired Twitter in April 2016 for $44 billion."
> A solar eclipse is a partial eclipse of the Sun caused by a solar coronal mass ejection . A solar coronal mass ejection occurs when Earth passes directly in front of the sun.
> You will also need to calculate number of seconds it takes for earth to rotate around the sun which is calculated as Math.PI * 2 / 60