Re:Stop that It’s not Tourette’s but a new type of mass soci...
by maxbond on Tuesday December 06, 2022 @08:12AM
(#33879108)
I'm not saying you are wrong, but in the culture of my household, my school, and the people I had contact with as a child, this was seen as strange and something to be discouraged, because these things were seen as gendered.
I think these things were much more gendered at the time, as well. It is crazy for me to look back and remember how there was a time when I hadn't made up my mind about whether gay marriage was okay or not. Things have changed a lot over the past 20 years or so.
Re:Stop that It’s not Tourette’s but a new type of mass soci...
by zztop44 on Tuesday December 06, 2022 @08:17AM
(#33879169)
I think you might be missing the forest for the trees. Barbies and lipstick are not exclusive to one gender, but they are associated with one gender. I don’t think it’s controversial to say that people in general will respond differently to a little boy who likes playing with lipstick and barbie dolls compared to a little girl.
Re:Stop that It’s not Tourette’s but a new type of mass soci...
by rendall on Tuesday December 06, 2022 @08:34AM
(#33879390)
I dunno. My social set would never discourage a child from this at all. However, of those of us who had children, only one (out of, like 50+ children in our extended set) was gender non-conforming boy at 3 and liked to wear girl's clothes and play with dolls.
I wouldn't see trying on lipstick or playing with Barbie dolls as "exploring a gender identity" as neither of those are exclusive to one gender, even in a heteronormative world.