News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT passes the 2022 AP Computer Science A free respon... by nl on Sunday December 04, 2022 @11:17PM (#33861402)
I think it is failing at reading comprehension because it is putting too much emphasis on 3 events (A, B and C) ordered.

If we rewrite the question to make it very simple to interpret it gets the logic correct:

Imagine a set of 3 ordered events (A, C and B) with unique timestamps each. The ordering is A, C, B. What is a valid bound for Event B's timestamp?

> A valid bound for Event B's timestamp would be a range of values that fall between the timestamp of Event A and the timestamp of Event C. For example, if the timestamp of Event A is 5:00 PM and the timestamp of Event C is 6:00 PM, a valid bound for Event B's timestamp could be 5:15 PM to 5:45 PM.

Re:ChatGPT passes the 2022 AP Computer Science A free respon... by pedrosorio on Monday December 05, 2022 @01:07AM (#33862064)
What? The logic in your example is not correct. Is that you GPT?
Re:ChatGPT passes the 2022 AP Computer Science A free respon... by nl on Monday December 05, 2022 @12:56PM (#33869084)
Oh god.

I was trying so many combinations I didn't even notice this one had switched.