Re:Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock’s...
by flebron on Sunday December 04, 2022 @06:26PM
(#33859201)
That seems a weird use of the word. By that notion, every convicted criminal is a victim, because the court imposed a sentence that they, presumably, do not like. This removes practically all meaning from the word "victim". In common parlance, well-understood consequences of one's own actions occurring does not make one a victim.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock’s...
by pessimizer on Sunday December 04, 2022 @06:30PM
(#33859243)
> This removes practically all meaning from the word "victim".
No, it removes the personal judgement from the word "victim," where we decide whether a particular victim deserves their punishment as a preliminary to discussing their situation.
edit: i.e. where sympathetic people who are killed are victims, and unsympathetic people are killed are being portrayed as victims. It's an attempt to distract from the material facts of a situation with arguments about language.
Re:Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock’s...
by enkid on Sunday December 04, 2022 @07:23PM
(#33859712)
But your original reply didn't say "he didn't call himself a victim," it tried to argue why he was a victim. The gp to this reply was pointing out how absurd your definition of victim is. It's not making an argument about whether or not he called himself a victim, it makes an argument about what you yourself defined as a victim.
Re:Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock’s...
by pessimizer on Sunday December 04, 2022 @07:44PM
(#33859878)
I've made that argument, and you can accept it or not. The larger point is that accusing people of playing victims is always a distraction from actual argument, and the entire thread is evidence of that. It started with irrelevance and ended nowhere.
Re:Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock’s...
by posterboy on Sunday December 04, 2022 @08:42PM
(#33860335)
> The larger point is that accusing people of playing victims is always a distraction from actual argume
Yes, and when they are really playing they become the victim of their own ploy.
Re:Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock’s...
by bdowling on Monday December 05, 2022 @01:05AM
(#33862053)
If a court ignored the law and imposed a criminal sentence merely because it didn't like the defendant, then that would be an injustice and you would call the convicted person a victim.