> You're conflating negligence/dereliction of duty and bus-factor-of-one here, while Fosshost suffers from both, they are not the same thing.

I appreciate the distinction, but they're certainly related. We can see that because we can achieve the same result with a bus accident as with dereliction, and that addressing the dereliction without addressing the bus factor will result in a repeat of the problem.

> I don't see why you assume why a new CEO would resist relinquishing all treasury duties.

I don't, that was a thought experiment to illustrate the point that addressing the dereliction does not address the root cause.