I see everyone saying this while ignoring the timeline. This happened before the 2020 elections. Biden was not president back then.
No, the millions of voters who selected him over trump did that.
This hit job using hacked iCloud information to post revenge porn of Hunter Biden was not going to change people's votes, it had nothing to do with Joe Biden. Just another Russian hack job.
(Note, for example that the poll numbers you read in the NY Post were based on 437 of the original 1,335 respondents because they literally excluded everyone else to get the numbers they wanted to base this story on.)
People voted Trump out because he utterly gutted our country, even when handed layup after layup. Knock it off with this "Biden was installed" shit, jesus christ.
But let's ignore that and repeat all the bad stuff the news told us Trump did, and how Biden is a saint for swooping in and saving our democracy.
Like what?
I am not engaging in a discussion where the other party handwaves away with a simple "many of the things". You don't get to pull that junk and then say "let's label everyone willfully ignorant".
"10.Both parties had access to these tools. For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. However:"
in this case the government was run by donald trump, and the censorship was to remove stolen revenge porn
And the US government isn't run by any one person. The president is the most powerful individual, but there are other officials (both elected and appointed), and they are the ones who colluded.
I don't care whether it's the president, or the speaker of the house, or a freshly-trained FBI agent. Nobody in government should be pressuring private companies to prevent people from reading what they want to read.
This has absolutely nothing to do with Hunter's ****.
I've heard it phrased this way: never send an email that you wouldn't be happy to read out in court.
But I'm curious, how can this policy be enforced? If I delete some of my work emails, how can a court prove that the emails ever existed and that I deleted them?
As I was told in my first day of training at a large investment bank, "If you have something sensitive to discuss, pick up the phone".
> there is no clear evidence that they explicitly favored one party, and to be honest- I don't really care if they do
Ah yes the old, "It didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, they deserved it."
If you truly believe that there's no clear evidence, then I don't know what to tell you. Taibbi shows emails where Twitter and the US government collude to censor true information that people wanted to read. That is a big deal.