Re:PyTorch 2.0
by brap on Friday December 02, 2022 @01:38PM
(#33834770)
I’m not sure why, but I realized it was AI from the very first sentence, not exaggerating. It’s just not something someone on HN would write.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:PyTorch 2.0
by eastWestMath on Friday December 02, 2022 @02:28PM
(#33835558)
It reminded me of the sort of lazy Wikipedia regurgitation that a lot of undergrads used to give when I was teaching. So it is a bit jarring to see a response like that in a non-compulsory setting.
Re:PyTorch 2.0
by windsignaling on Friday December 02, 2022 @03:22PM
(#33836360)
Yup. Reminds me of an article you'd find in the top 10 Google search results...