Pop store is a different story, but that's a very specific thing.
GNOME's software centre issues very clearly stem from the diversity of package managers and formats and environments it has to support because Linux actually has a decentralized application ecosystem. On Android, F-Droid likes to claim that the "technical skill" needed to install other packages is an artificial barrier which is just imposed by Google, yet it merely piggybacks off the usability & simplicity of Google's centrally developed package formats (.apk or .appbundle) and package manager (PackageManager). When the ecosystem is actually decentralized, GNOME software shows just how user unfriendly things become.
it's great if you're an indie software developer who cares about things like fairness and other apps not being featured above your own, but it's certainly a long ways off from the app store experience of android or iOS in nearly every metric that my mum might care about.
Also, web performance is still a concern on mobile devices which means it's still impractical as a native replacement for some use cases.
Emphasis mine. It's a nice sleight of hand to go from claiming they don't "work badly" to finally conceding they merely "work", no attempt to demonstrate that they work well.
Apparently a great example is Windows, a notorious dumpster fire so filled with unverifiable garbage it spawned a secondary market of antivirus software.
Or GNOME software, which I assume they just meant Linux software, where apt/dnf/Flatpak/Snapcraft has definitely not caused user confusion and a million help articles about how to use it and which to use with weird fan rivalries /s. Or works so well it allows users to accidentally delete their desktop environment [1].
Don't know much about the Chinese app store market, but it's not like any Chinese market could be considered decentralized when the central government has more restrictions than any Western app store.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/pop_os/comments/qqa44e/linus_tech_t...