> First, eslint is a developer tool and not intended to run in the browser.
from the linked article: "Yes, that means an officially supported browser version!"
Re:Complete Rewrite of ESLint
by freshbakedbread on Monday November 28, 2022 @01:24PM
(#33777392)
The point still stands that an officially supported browser version can still be typescript transpiled to JavaScript.
This statement makes no sense in two ways and shows you're not as accustomed to the problems at hand as you'd perhaps like to be. First, eslint is a developer tool and not intended to run in the browser. Second, you generally do not distribute typescript code but compiled js to target platforms.
> TypeScript seems to have entered the same hype cycle as Rust (if it didn't do it before Rust) where people seem to think that everything written in X should actually be written in Y instead (C/C++ => Rust and JavaScript/Any compile to JS => TypeScript). Doesn't mean every project have to follow that though.
No, TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that can be enabled with little cost for the gigantic benefit of bringing type safety to a language which people have mocked for its unsafety for decades.
I really wish people on HN would hold back a little with their contrarian purism at all cost.