Your quotes don’t say that at all. They say it’s waterproof up to 100m but you should not use it deeper than 40m. There’s a lot to do under water between 0 and 40m.
IIUC, local water pressure varies significantly when you move something around underwater
If Wikipedia can be trusted here, movement doesn't increase water pressure as much as we think: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diving_watch#Water_resistance Movement induced dynamic pressure increase is sometimes the subject
of urban myths and marketing arguments for diver's watches with
high water resistance ratings. When a diver makes a fast swimming
movement of 10m/s (32.8ft/s) (the best competitive swimmers and
finswimmers can not swim nearly that fast) physics dictates that
the diver generates a dynamic pressure of 0.5 bars (50kPa) or the
equivalent of 5 meters of additional water depth.
One other thing stands out to me... It means, essentially, that it theoretically would be safe at 100m depth
It's interesting (alarming?) that they chose the "weaker" ISO standard 22810 for water resistance, in which a sampling of units are tested:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_Resistant_mark
ISO 6425 is much more stringent and specifies that every single unit is pressure tested to 125% of rated capability, ie a 200M ISO 6425 watch has been individually tested at 250M for a period of time.
I looked at the Garmin spec sheets before buying my Apple Watch and didn't find any of their computer/watch combos listing ISO 6425. Instead they list a depth (usually 100M) and attest "Tested to engineering standard EN13319 for dive compliance", see https://www.garmin.com/en-US/legal/waterrating-definitions/
they seem like mostly a fashion / status symbol kind of thing
Yeah, this is my understanding from talking to diver friends. As a guy who likes watches yes, they're crazy popular in the watch community.They've become kind of a genre unto themselves. Citizen, Seiko, and others make affordable ISO 6425 models. I own a few, didn't pay more than $150 for any of them.
Though, I dunno about the "status symbol" aspect. For $30 you can get a diver-style watch that looks like an actual ISO 6425 watch unless you know specifically what you're looking for. So I don't think anybody would be impressed by them. But they are fun to own and rather handsome, if you like that kind of thing.
I stand corrected, but the same article also states:
“Water Resistant 100 m […] NOT suitable for diving.”
“Water Resistant 200 m [.] Suitable for skin diving only. NOT suitable for scuba diving.”
And, IIUC, WR100 is exactly what the Apple Watch Ultra has.
Almost every recreational dive site for commercial reasons would only be taking divers down to those depths.
If you're going beyond 30m then you know what you're doing and are not going to be reckless enough to use any device which is not rated for that depth. No one is going to care about warranty if they are dead.
Apple Watch Ultra has a water resistance rating of 100 meters under ISO standard 22810.
Apple Watch Ultra may be used for recreational scuba diving (with a compatible third-party app from the App Store) to 40 meters, and for high-speed water sports.
Apple Watch Ultra should not be used for diving below 40 meters. Water resistance is not a permanent condition and can diminish over time. For additional information, see support.apple.com/en-us/HT205000.