News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Man wins the legal right to not be 'fun' at work by netrus on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:21PM (#33765777)
It's borderline accepted in some cases, usually when corporate travel is also benefiting the employee in some way - attending cool conferences (especially widespread in academia...), or for "fun" team-building trips. Luckily never happend to me, but not super uncommon. Usually you have the choice to say No, but at the price of being difficult (and potentially losing the next opportunity for a trip).
Re:Man wins the legal right to not be 'fun' at work by chrisseaton on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:24PM (#33765801)
> It's borderline accepted in some cases

Sharing a freaking bed as an adult? Top-and-tail with a random colleague who may be in a relationship? What if they put you in a bed with someone with you know has a crush on you? Or who has hygiene issues? Or who snores? No it absolutely isn’t accepted at work, unless France is completely different for professional and personal standards to the rest of the developed world. No functional HR organisation would accept the risk. Where would they stand if the other person touched you in the night and claimed they were asleep?

Re:Man wins the legal right to not be 'fun' at work by retrac on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:50PM (#33766081)
It's a familiar practice to me, and my buddies in construction and trades here in Canada complain about it sometimes, particularly the oil industry. Four guys and two double beds in the motel. Dormitory-style accommodation are common too, typically 6 - 8 men and bunk beds and a shared bathroom and living space. Such assignments are usually short though, a few weeks. People expect a private room or an apartment, for longer than that, and they're usually hauled in, in the form of trailers or similar.
Re:Man wins the legal right to not be 'fun' at work by chrisseaton on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:52PM (#33766107)
I've accepted dormitory-style accommodation and worse in the Army, but I wouldn't expect even the Army to ask me to literally share a bed with another adult.

And this is a bank, not wilderness work or the Army.

Re:Man wins the legal right to not be 'fun' at work by umanwizard on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:23PM (#33765790)
I’ve heard of people sharing rooms at work events (which I already think is crazy) but not sharing a bed …
Re:Man wins the legal right to not be 'fun' at work by myself248 on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:44PM (#33766025)
At an old job, our per-diem was basically cash and we didn't submit receipts for reimbursement. Here's some money, whatever you don't spend, is yours to keep. Most of the guys just saw it as incentive to stay cheap and blow the extra at the bar..

So we'd stay as cheap as possible. Double, triple, quadruple up on rooms. Sleeping bag on the floor, scheduling who showers when. Learned the trick of laying a line of luggage down the middle of the bed, so if you accidentally snuggle up to something in the middle of the night, it's just a duffel bag.

I think per diem was in the $60-70/night range at the time, I don't recall exactly. But I know after a few months of working out of town, I was suddenly able to afford my next car without a loan.

But if the company tried to _require_ that? Oh, hell no. Heeeeelllllll no.

Re:Man wins the legal right to not be 'fun' at work by sandos on Monday November 28, 2022 @05:51AM (#33772027)
Its 100% accepted here in Sweden. Caveat, never with the other sex than yours, not that always helps!

Our conferences always book double rooms and they are shared. Never a complaint as far as I know. BUT, our conferences are 100% optional, so you do not need to attend. Just saying that this "sharing bed" thing is not that unusual.

This is a IT consultants firm, btw.