>This seems like the logical progression and doesn’t necessarily result in a loss of jobs.
It is not the logical progression. Your conclusion isn't logical at all. It falls into typical biased trappings:
1. People tend to bias towards optimism.
2. People tend to fall for analogies. If one scenario worked they may use that scenario as evidence to scaffold reasoning that suits their interpretation of reality.
You made an idealized and biased hypothesis. Demand doesn't necessarily ALWAYS increase just because supply increases. It is the definition of being illogical.
When you look at people in the oil business and you ask how do they twist reality such that something like global warming doesn't exist for them; I have an answer for this question. It's from the exact same biased trappings I mentioned above.
When you look at people in the AI business and ask how do they twist reality such that the economic impact of AI can only be absolutely positive; I have an answer for this question. It's from the exact same biased trappings I mentioned above.
Don't be biased. Self reflect and change. AI can be a net benefit to society but it can also be a huge negative as well. Most likely it will be a combination of both.
However, being a visual effects artist has actually gotten harder. The pay has become lower and the work has become much more demanding.
Source: https://www.cnet.com/culture/entertainment/marvels-vfx-artis...
>This seems like the logical progression and doesn’t necessarily result in a loss of jobs.
It is not the logical progression. Your conclusion isn't logical at all. It falls into typical biased trappings:
You made an idealized and biased hypothesis. Demand doesn't necessarily ALWAYS increase just because supply increases. It is the definition of being illogical.When you look at people in the oil business and you ask how do they twist reality such that something like global warming doesn't exist for them; I have an answer for this question. It's from the exact same biased trappings I mentioned above.
When you look at people in the AI business and ask how do they twist reality such that the economic impact of AI can only be absolutely positive; I have an answer for this question. It's from the exact same biased trappings I mentioned above.
Don't be biased. Self reflect and change. AI can be a net benefit to society but it can also be a huge negative as well. Most likely it will be a combination of both.