Re:The Citroen Ami – tiny electric car with no boot, 28mph t...
by lm28469 on Saturday November 26, 2022 @06:37PM
(#33758158)
The two aren't mutually exclusive
Re:The Citroen Ami – tiny electric car with no boot, 28mph t...
by thiht on Sunday November 27, 2022 @10:21AM
(#33763482)
Yeah they kinda are. Scales matter. I know the « A not as bad as B » fallacy and in my opinion it falls short when A is completely negligible compared to B, because it’s not a fallacy anymore, it’s just reality.
Re:The Citroen Ami – tiny electric car with no boot, 28mph t...
by thiht on Sunday November 27, 2022 @10:26AM
(#33763515)
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
Using fallacies to invalidate arguments should be a fallacy by itself. Maybe my argument is a fallacy logically speaking, but in the real world, not everything is ruled by formal logic. If A is completely negligible compared to B, the « A not as bad as B » fallacy doesn’t apply anymore.
Re:The Citroen Ami – tiny electric car with no boot, 28mph t...
by nephanth on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @03:47AM
(#33798390)
Of course it still does.
To me, your argument sounds pretty much the same as "The us dropped a nuke on Hiroshima. Me throwing a molotov at my neighbor is fine."
Sure that molotov is negligible in front of B. Doesn't make it okay
Re:The Citroen Ami – tiny electric car with no boot, 28mph t...
by thiht on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @12:00PM
(#33803607)
A more proper equivalent would be me throwing a molotov on hiroshima the day after the nuke impact. Same victim.
The atmosphere is global, there's no Qatar's atmosphere and my neighbor's atmosphere
There’s currently football matches being played in Qatar in stadiums with AC set to 20°C in 32°C weather. Thousands of people have travelled there by plane.
Me having a car is fine.