Re:Earth might be experiencing 7th mass extinction, not 6th
by daveguy on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @08:04PM
(#33726631)
> Given the highly falsifiable nature of his claims it should easy enough to disprove them.
I'm not sure how a fever dream about something that happened 12,000 years ago is falsifiable.
What evidence would you propose falsifies his theories?
If you believe you can watch a hundred proofs on both sides of flat-earth, you may want to reconsider your understanding of the word "proof".
Proof is the burden of the claimant.
If he had presented a plausible proof, there would probably be a spirited debate.
It is curious that ignoring someone is considered "suppression" by those ignored.
Re:Earth might be experiencing 7th mass extinction, not 6th
by teh_klev on Thursday November 24, 2022 @06:20AM
(#33730065)
> Given the highly falsifiable nature of his claims it should easy enough to disprove them. That nobody chooses to do so is quite curious.
Because it isn't worth anyone's precious time and effort in academia to respond to such obvious bunkum?
Given the highly falsifiable nature of his claims it should easy enough to disprove them. That nobody chooses to do so is quite curious. I can watch a hundred spirited debates and proofs on both sides of flat-earth, fake moon landing, essential oils curing cancer, and evolution vs young-earth creationism. What is so special about archaeology that it needn't mount a similar, vigorous defense?